Physicians’ radiation exposure in the catheterization lab: does the type of procedure matter?

Publié le 29 janvier 2014 • Catégorie(s) : Rayonnements • Mot(s) clef(s) : médecins

Auteur Maja Ingwersen
Auteur Anna Drabik
Auteur Ulrike Kulka
Auteur Ursula Oestreicher
Auteur Simon Fricke
Auteur Hans Krankenberg
Auteur Carsten Schwencke
Auteur Detlef Mathey
Volume 6
Numéro 10
Pages 1095-1102
Publication JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
Date Oct 2013
Résumé OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate differences in radiation exposure of the operator depending on the type of catheterization lab procedure. BACKGROUND: Invasive cardiologists and angiologists are exposed to long-term, low-dose occupational radiation. Increased workload and specialization require more detailed knowledge of the extent and cause of the radiation exposure. METHODS: In this prospective single-center experience, radiation doses of 3 operators were measured by real-time dosimetry for body, neck, and hand during 284 procedures in 281 patients over a period of 14 weeks. To determine the association between the type of procedure and the doses and to draw a pairwise comparison between the procedures, 3 mixed models were used. RESULTS: The type of procedure, the patient’s body mass index, and the fluoroscopy time were independently associated with the operator’s radiation exposure. Per procedure, the operators were exposed to a mean effective dose (E) of 2.2 ± 5.9 μSv. Compared with coronary angiography, E was 2.3-fold higher in pelvic procedures (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7 to 3.0, p < 0.001), 1.7-fold higher in upper limb procedures (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.1, p < 0.001), and 1.4-fold higher in below-the-knee procedures (95% CI: 1.1 to 2.0, p = 0.023). The mean eye dose was 19.1 ± 37.6 μSv. Eye doses were significantly higher in peripheral procedures than in coronary angiography procedures. The mean hand dose was 99.6 ± 196.0 μSv. Hand doses were significantly higher in pelvic than in coronary angiography, upper limb, and below-the-knee procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular procedures for pelvic, upper limb, and below-the-knee disease are accompanied with a higher radiation exposure of the operator than with coronary procedures.